Increa Technology Blog

Any identification you have, or computer record about you is not about who you are. Rather it is about who you have been. It proves what your history is: law abiding citizen, good investor, parent who dropped off child, enrolled college student. Whatever. You got the ID to prove what you were at some point in time, and by flashing the ID you prove you are connected to that history. If you want to know more about this idea, you can search the Increa Technology Blog for the word “identity” or read a prior post.

Someone stealing your identity doesn’t care who you are. What they are after is who you have been. That person with good credit. Or that person with a certain demographic. Or that person with insurance privileges. Or that person who has already accumulated money in the bank worth taking. The record of your past transactions is what gives you everything from a credit score to an eBay bid history.

Taking your history then, is, by definition, identity theft.

I was aghast recently to learn of a court-ordered identity theft. What I mean is a sitting judge ordered an entire financial history to be transfered from one person to the other. A clarification was asked in court, and the judge specifically said the account, with all it’s history, was to be transfered. Not just the dollar amount. The entire identity and history.

Traditionally, these transfers have always been done by creating a new account and transferring the balance in dollars or stock shares, or whatever. This is different. The name and social security number on the account are simply replaced.

If you work in the Internet commerce world, you can understand this is as if a judge ordered your entire eBay bid history, feedback history, and trust-factor be given to someone else. It would also include your linked Paypal account, and every transaction there. In addition to your internet user names and passwords. A history that took years of time and dollars to build instantly becomes the history and character and identity of someone else.

I have never heard of such a thing before. Is this legal? I know judges can order asset transfers to settle court cases. But never before did I know a judge can order your financial history to be switched over and now belong to another person.

The new owner, of course, has full access to account assets. This is normally what a judgment or settlement is meant to include. In a world of internet identities, controlled by the order of judges who do not understand the new financial age, a judge can unknowingly or knowingly do much more. Specifically, by transferring the account itself rather than the value in the account,

• it is as if the new owner is you, and can interact with any merchantas you through the pre-approved bank account number and username.
• the new person has full access and knowledge of every financial transaction you ever did with the account. The person has full access to your account history. Prior business dealings, prior friends, prior purchase records. Everything. When they pull their account history, it is what used to be your history. Isn’t there some privacy act law against this?
• imagine that the bank account is linked to other assets, and now the new owner has full capability to empty your other linked accounts because they have full capability to simulate YOU as an internet user. The original bank won’t un-link the secondary account upon your request because you no longer own the account! The linked bank won’t prevent the transfer because it is a “pre-approved merchant ACH” transfer, which can only be stopped by the requester.

If there is anything about this idea you think this is wrong, and you have ideas to mitigate the effect or stop such happenings, please contact me. If there is any way to legally reverse such a court order or hold appropriate parties responsible because of the identity theft involved, I would like to know how to do it.

The Gardasil vaccine protects against two types of hyman papilloma viruses, which cause cervical cancer.  These two strains of virus can be transfered only by sexual intercourse.

Cited on Page A-2 of the March 3rd, 2008 Holland Sentinel paper, “We started in the 1800s with just one vaccine - smallpox.  In 1982 it was 23 does of seven vaccines and today it’s 48 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6.”

(copyright Peter Mayer, I believe)

We have been weighed down by sadness like a stone.
We have yearned, we have yearned.
We have sometimes felt so utterly alone — while we turn, while we turn.
We’ve been stricken by the wonder of it all — stricken down; stricken down.
We have sometimes felt so faint we want to fall — overcome, but all along

I’d say this year in flight together has been fun;
What say we make one more circle around the sun?

We have raised our fists in anger and we tried to work it out, work it out.
That we need each other we cannot deny — is no doubt, is no doubt.
Let us weave another dream in outer space while we’re turning, while we’re turning.
On this planet home that holds our human race still are learning all along.

Say this year in flight together has been fun;
What say we make one more circle around the sun?

Say this year in flight together has been a good good one.
What say we make one more circle, one more circle, one more circle around the sun?

Around the sun…

Corrections below, using http://www.guntheranderson.com/v/data/godisari.htm as the starting point.

ARTIST: Peter Mayer
TITLE: God Is a River
Lyrics and Chords

[ Amadd9 =  ; A7/C# =  ]

[Capo 2]

Intro: / Amadd9 Em7 C Em7 / / 

In the ever-shifting waters of the river of this life
I was swimming, seeking comfort; I was wrestling waves to find
A boulder I could cling to, a stone to hold me fast
Where I let the fretful water of this river ’round me pass

/ Amadd9 Em7 C Em7 / / / Amadd9 Em7 C A7/C# / Bm G Em7 AAsus4 A / 

And so I found an anchor, a blessed resting place
A trusty rock I called my savior, for there I would be safe
From the river and its dangers, and I proclaimed my rock divine
And I prayed to it “protect me” and the rock replied

… / Bm G Em7 A7 - - /

{Refrain}
God is a river, not just a stone
God is a wild, raging rapids
And a slow, meandering flow
God is a deep and narrow passage
A peaceful, sandy shore
God is a river, swimmer
So let go

/ D - A7 - / A7sus4 A7 / D - / G - / D Bm / G A7 A7sus4A7 / Intro / 

Still I clung to my rock tightly with conviction in my arms
Never looking at the stream to keep my mind from thoughts of harm
But the river kept on coming, kept on tugging at my legs
Till at last my fingers faltered, and I was swept away

So I’m going with the flow now, these relentless twists and bends
Acclimating to the motion, and a sense of being led
And this river’s like my body now, it carries me along
Through the ever-changing scenes and by the rocks that sing their song

{Refrain}

… / G A7 / Bm - /

God is the river, swimmer
So let go

/ G A7 A7sus4A7 / Intro /

Someone asked me the other day, “What do you want?” And my brain locked up, unable to answer. I realized that when I find myself trying to verbalize want of something, I come up woefully short. I’ve decided that is because I’m a finite creature stuck in a world of time, with a language that is woefully incomplete. I’m struggling (sorry, Jessica) to develop a language set and habits of speaking that implicitly respect time. I’d like to petition the residents of Dictionopolis to christen two new verbs “wantnow” and “wanthen”.

I’ve been fascinated by linguistics because consideration of other languages makes me aware of shortcomings of English, my native tongue. I know a tiny bit about Hebrew, with its rich nouns. Greek and its pervasive verb tenses. Chinese, with a word for every nuance, and German with its run-on nouns. One of the biggest omissions I find in languages is a complete concept of time. The concept of time has always been external to the syntax and structure. It lives as a language external - something the language can be used to speak about, but I don’t know of any structure that embeds language internally to its frame.

For you Computer Science majors, this internal/external thing is like Object Oriented Programming. Back in 1986, before there was such a thing, I used Pascal to implement an object model. It was explicit and crude and took pages of code. Later, we received new languages that had the concept and infrastructure built in the syntax. They’re smooth and implicit and we gained a vocabulary of “methods” and “instances” and “objects”. What was done externally became internal to the compiler.

Those of you who have dealt with encryption, government secrets, and intelligence gathering, you might recognize the concept of “message internals” and “message externals.” Without even reading the message, a message external already says something. Check the section titled “Support to the Pacific Fleet” in this analysis of Pearl Harbor events, any description of COMINT.

Saying nothing, you communicate a lot with message externals. Imagine you’re married, two kids, and they get into a fight. In a stern voice, you say, “Johnny, come here Dad needs to speak to you.” In context, and simply because the message exists, it already communicates something. I’ll bet Johnny didn’t even need to hear the rest of the message internals. Some guy asking you out that you’d rather not spend time with? Say nothing and return no phone calls. I’ll bet your message externals will have an effect.

Balancing interpersonal message internals and externals, BTW, is another topic rich in Christianity and grace. In short, maybe all our message internals should be loving, even if our message externals have to interface to the world.

Developing an internal structure of time into my language is important because time is an unappreciated huge parameter of life itself. Time can kill or allow to live. It has social moral implications. It can redeem lost souls.

When thinking about issues of death, a line from Princess Bride comes to mind: “Good night Wesley. Sleep well. Very likely I’ll kill you in the morning.” Indeed, expecting death perpetually tomorrow gives one a presence and immediacy and vibrancy for today. In the movie “Castaway”, Tom Hanks survives with a horizon of hours. Each day, he wakes up to breath one more time, unable to even kill himself because of the expectations and dreams of what he cannot retrieve.

Time’s moral implications on a Christian college campus such as Hope will bear down on a majority of students before they graduate. When I was a college student, a friend freely engaged in sexual relations with a girl friend because, “We love each other so much it’s as if we’re already married.” But they weren’t - not yet. Time slowly levied its wedge into their lives, and as is often the case, what we think now about tomorrow never became today. They never were married and the outcome of what they had done had large moral and social fall-out.

Lastly, implicit into the redemption message of God are forbearance and patience with time that allow each person’s soul time to respond and reply to the witnesses set before them. Romans 2:4 admonishes that human impatience to judge shows “contempt for the riches of His kindness, tolerance and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness leads you toward repentance.”

THEREFORE, here are some questions to ask yourself. If you don’t intentionally do this, the limits of the English language will allow you to continue in blind terpitude. Do better for yourself. Actively think about “wantnow” and “wanthen” verbs whenever you use the word “want”.

• “I want an iPod” - When? Newer models will be out tomorrow. Internet radio sites are not enough? If you follow your wantnow desires, what are you giving up later that can’t spend the money on when you wanthen something else?
• “Do you want to supersize that?” - Uh, yea, the fries taste great. I also want to take care of the body God’s given me. Wantnow says yes. Wanthen says no.
• “I want to redeem a relationship with my family.” - There is a want that manifests itself at the setting sun, pining for what cannot be. There is also a want that drives an immediate planned act, with hope and expectation for what is not yet seen. If you wantnow to have a good relationship, maybe you’ll do something. If you wanthen, maybe you’ll quietly enjoy a few more sunsets first.
• “I want to sleep with my new boyfriend.” - Wantnow is pretty vivid, isn’t it? If you make a choice to proceed, what do you wanthen?
• “I want to get a good grade.” - I wantnow to hang out with friends and watch a movie. If you wanthen good grades, can you pull motivation from that future time into today?

I have been paralyzed into indecision too often when confronted with questions of “What do I want?” Maybe that’s because the English language didn’t give me enough words to ask the right questions. I’m experimenting with my new verbs wantnow and wantthen. Let me know if they help you!

Written by contemporary playwright Steven Dietz, THE NINA VARIATIONS arose from Dietz’s work on an adaptation of THE SEAGULL but his inability to let go of the final scene between Nina and Treplev. His play gives Nina and Treplev repeated opportunities to return to their last exchange and to express what Dietz calls “the fundamentals of life: love, loss, hope, regret, dreams, death.”

Love - wondering

Loss - not many, but large

Hope - always

Regret - pervasive

Dreams - continuous

Death - not much, yet

Sometimes there are specific tasks that need to be done.  Nearly perfectly, without mistakes.  If you have these in front of you, do them as required.  But when you’re in pursuit of a relationship, the rules change.  In this case, send that letter, fill out the form, or answer the query, even if the response isn’t perfect yet.

In means as much to the recipient now as it it will later if you fix it.  Don’t re-accomplish the whole thing.  Or think about it again.  Or plan to reword a few items.

If it’s a relationship that was meant to be, a few word tweaks aren’t going to make or break the situation.  If they have a propensity to think badly of you, I bet a perfect letter isn’t going to fix the situation.  On the other hand, if they favor your presence and who you are, they are willing to read right past any mistake you might not catch.

Pursuit of Task Goals and Pursuit of Relationships are both legitimate activities.  I suspect they’re pursued in very different ways.